Upgrading PidginPortable to version 2.2.1

If you don't want to read the whole post, here is a link to the download:
PidginPortable 2.2.1

I use Pidgin for most of my IM needs, and in order to keep my logs all in one place, I use the PortableApps.com version of PidginPortable and keep it on my USB Drive.

However, the version of PidginPortable on PortableApps.com hasn't been updated since mid August and is still stuck at version 2.1.1 while the latest official release is 2.2.1 which includes several important new features (such as MySpaceIM protocol), bug fixes, and even an important security fix. I finally got annoyed at being stuck with version 2.1.1 (especially since every time I started PidginPortable up I got a reminder message saying that there was a newer version available), and I decided to see if there was an easy way to upgrade the PortableApps distribution to 2.2.1.

It actually turned out to be really easy. All you need to do to upgrade is to replace the files in your "PidginPortable\App\Pidgin" folder with the same files from the current release of Pidgin. Unfortunately there isn't a binary only distribution on the Pidgin SourceForge page, so I installed Pidgin on my computer using the packaged installer and copied the files out of the installation directory. I also used upx to compress the pidgin.exe in order to save a little bit of space.

In order to make it easier for others who may be looking for the same thing, I have posted my updated version of PidginPortable on mediafire.com. Here is a link:

http://www.mediafire.com/?4q1dovsuto5

edit: I have updated to version 2.3 please use this new download link

http://www.mediafire.com/?8mmnmtxs9jc

To scrape or not to scrape?

Recently Zap2It, the company which had been providing XML based TV listings for free to open source software such as MythTV, decided to shutdown their free XMLTV service. The "official" replacement for the service is a non-profit startup, SchedulesDirect. They now provide XML TV listings for a very reasonable price of $20/year.

I always have a hard time forking over money for something that I can get for free elsewhere, and in the wake of the labs.zap2it.com closure several enterprising individuals have developed programs which scrape TV listings from commercial websites. One of these is a PERL program called Zap2XML. I can report that the program works great, and there are even a couple of setup guides floating around around that target MythTV users.

However, the use of the program in my opinion constitutes a bit of a moral and ethical dilemma. You see there is the little problem of the fact that when I signed up for a free Zap2it.com account, I agreed to their Terms of Service which say "You may not scrape or otherwise copy our Content without permission" which technically prohibits me from scraping their website. However, their TOS also says, "you may download or print a single copy of any portion of the Content solely for your personal, non-commercial use". I believe that even though they prohibit me from scraping their website for listings with a program like Zap2XML, that as long as I am using it only for "personal, non-commercial use" that I am probably ok.

I believe that their reason for prohibiting scraping is two-fold. One, it prevents other websites from scraping Zap2It's TV listings (which they paid TMS a lot of money for) and then rebranding the content and displaying elsewhere. I am clearly not doing this, but the second reason is an even bigger moral dilemma. You see Zap2It (as well as 90% of the rest of the internet) depends upon advertising revenues to cover at least part of the cost of their doing business, and when I use a program like Zap2XML to scrape listings from their website I am obtaining content from them without viewing their advertising. Some people have argued that this is stealing, and this leads into the even bigger question of the morality behind online advertising and ad blockers such as Adblock Plus which is a whole other ball of wax that I don't really want to get into right now, but suffice it to say that I believe that there is some validity to arguments on both sides of the issue

I believe that this issue is the second reason why Zap2It specifically prohibits scrapers. They are providing content that costs them money to produce. Additionally there are costs involved in bandwidth and servers, and they believe that they have a right to recover part of those costs through advertising revenues. Now, I am not opposed to their collecting ad revenues from my viewing of their website, but I also feel like I have the right to select which content I view and how I view it, and so for now I am using Zap2XML.

Anyways, I just thought that I would throw some of this issue out there and see how my readers feel about this issue. Please feel free to post any and all comments or opinions that you might have on the morality and ethics behind this issue.